Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Kalshi vs Polymarket) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | View on Polymarket → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | View on Polymarket → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | View on Polymarket → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | View on Polymarket → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | View on Polymarket → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Completed Match | 100% |
| ITF Bali: Sanhui Shin vs Alexander Chang Set 1 O/U 8.5 | 100% |
| ITF Bali: Sanhui Shin vs Alexander Chang Set 1 O/U 9.5 | 100% |
| ITF Bali: Sanhui Shin vs Alexander Chang | 0% |
| ITF Bali: Sanhui Shin vs Alexander Chang Set 1 Winner | 0% |
| ITF Bali: Sanhui Shin vs Alexander Chang Set 2 Winner | 0% |
| ITF Bali: Sanhui Shin vs Alexander Chang Set 2 O/U 8.5 | 0% |
| ITF Bali: Sanhui Shin vs Alexander Chang Total Sets: O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| ITF Bali: Sanhui Shin vs Alexander Chang Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 0% |
| ITF Bali: Sanhui Shin vs Alexander Chang Match O/U 21.5 | 0% |
| ITF Bali: Sanhui Shin vs Alexander Chang Set 2 O/U 9.5 | 0% |
| ITF Bali: Sanhui Shin vs Alexander Chang Match O/U 22.5 | 0% |
| ITF Bali: Sanhui Shin vs Alexander Chang Set 1 O/U 10.5 | 0% |
| ITF Bali: Sanhui Shin vs Alexander Chang Set 2 O/U 10.5 | 0% |
| ITF Bali: Sanhui Shin vs Alexander Chang Match O/U 23.5 | 0% |
Market context
Sanhui Shin’s match against Alexander Chang in the ITF Men Bali is the relevant real-world event, and the contract is currently pricing a **0% YES** outcome even though public odds screens still show Shin as a strong favourite. One odds-comparison page lists Shin at around **1.24** decimal odds, which implies roughly **74.4%** win probability, while Chang is around **25.6%**; that is a large gap versus the prediction market’s zero-implied price and suggests either stale market pricing or a contract-specific doubt about whether the match will be completed as scheduled.[1]
For historical framing, the useful comparator is how lower-tier ITF matches are often priced across books: favourites can still be backed heavily, but settlement risk matters more than in main-tour events because withdrawals, walkovers and schedule changes are more common. Kalshi’s own ITF Bali match markets note that if a match does not start, or if a player withdraws after play begins, the contract can resolve to **50-50** rather than a simple winner/loser outcome, so traders need to separate *tennis ability* from *event completion risk*.[5] Current sportsbook boards also show Alexander Chang in a different Bali match at around **1.57** against Azuma Visaya, which underlines that Chang is not being treated as a universal longshot by bookmakers, even if this specific contract is far less confident.[2]
The main catalysts are straightforward: official order-of-play updates, late withdrawals, and whether the fixture actually goes on court inside the settlement window. The contract description makes clear that if the match is not played at all, ends level, or is delayed more than seven days without a winner, it resolves 50-50, so traders should watch the tournament draw sheet, any injury or retirement notices, and same-day scheduling changes from the Bali ITF event feed.[5] Public odds feeds also suggest the market is lagging the match price rather than the other way round, so any fresh confirmation that the match is active should matter quickly.[1][4]
Methodology
We track ITF Bali: Sanhui Shin vs Alexander Chang across the five venues with material prediction-market liquidity. The probability shown is the live Polymarket mid; the comparison rows summarise how each venue treats the underlying contract — fees, KYC thresholds, settlement currency, deposit options. The highlighted row marks the cheapest route into Polymarket's order book.
Resolution & payout
At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.
On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is Kalshi vs Polymarket. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
Trade ITF Bali: Sanhui Shin vs Alexander Chang on Kalshi vs Polymarket
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →