🎁 New traders: 100% Deposit Match up to $500 · 0% fees · instant USDC payoutsClaim it →
Skip to main content
HomeGuideCryptoMarketsBlogView on Polymarket →

ITF Astana: Su Jeong Jang vs Asylzhan Arystanbekova

Five-platform snapshot of "ITF Astana: Su Jeong Jang vs Asylzhan Arystanbekova" — live Polymarket pricing, plus how Kalshi, Betfair and Manifold structure the same contract.

Completed Match 100% ITF Astana: Su Jeong Jang vs Asylzhan Arystanbekova Set 1 O/U 8.5 100% ITF Astana: Su Jeong Jang vs Asylzhan Arystanbekova 0% ITF Astana: Su Jeong Jang vs Asylzhan Arystanbekova Set 2 Winner 0% Volume: $82K Closes: 16 Aug 2026
Open live market →
ITF Astana: Su Jeong Jang vs Asylzhan Arystanbekova

Platform comparison

PlatformYES oddsNO oddsFeeKYCSettlement
Polymarket (via Kalshi vs Polymarket) Pick
polygram.ink (preferred broker)
100% 0% 0% (USDC on-chain) No-KYC up to $1,500 USDC, auto via UMA oracle View on Polymarket →
Polymarket (direct)
polymarket.com
100% 0% 0% Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU USDC, on-chain View on Polymarket →
Kalshi
kalshi.com
Up to 7% per trade US-only, KYC required USD View on Polymarket →
Betfair Exchange
betfair.com
2-5% commission Full KYC from first trade GBP / EUR View on Polymarket →
Manifold Markets
manifold.markets
Play-money (mana) None — play-money Mana (no cash-out) View on Polymarket →

Outcome probabilities

Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.

OutcomeProbability
Completed Match100%
ITF Astana: Su Jeong Jang vs Asylzhan Arystanbekova Set 1 O/U 8.5100%
ITF Astana: Su Jeong Jang vs Asylzhan Arystanbekova0%
ITF Astana: Su Jeong Jang vs Asylzhan Arystanbekova Set 2 Winner0%
ITF Astana: Su Jeong Jang vs Asylzhan Arystanbekova Match O/U 21.50%
ITF Astana: Su Jeong Jang vs Asylzhan Arystanbekova Set Handicap +/-1.50%
ITF Astana: Su Jeong Jang vs Asylzhan Arystanbekova Set 2 O/U 8.50%
ITF Astana: Su Jeong Jang vs Asylzhan Arystanbekova Total Sets: O/U 2.50%
ITF Astana: Su Jeong Jang vs Asylzhan Arystanbekova Match O/U 22.50%
ITF Astana: Su Jeong Jang vs Asylzhan Arystanbekova Set 1 O/U 9.50%
ITF Astana: Su Jeong Jang vs Asylzhan Arystanbekova Set 1 Winner0%
ITF Astana: Su Jeong Jang vs Asylzhan Arystanbekova Match O/U 23.50%
ITF Astana: Su Jeong Jang vs Asylzhan Arystanbekova Set 2 O/U 9.50%
ITF Astana: Su Jeong Jang vs Asylzhan Arystanbekova Set 1 O/U 10.50%
ITF Astana: Su Jeong Jang vs Asylzhan Arystanbekova Set 2 O/U 10.50%

Market context

Su Jeong Jang and Asylzhan Arystanbekova are meeting in the Astana ITF women’s draw, and the live cross-platform pricing picture is not especially close: Tennis Explorer lists Jang at 1.44 against Arystanbekova at 2.56 for the scheduled match, which implies roughly a 64%–36% split before margin. That sits awkwardly against the prediction market’s current 0% YES reading, which is far more extreme than the tennis pricing and would usually indicate either a stale contract, thin liquidity, or market participants discounting the match being completed at all. Comparable recent Astana data also points towards Jang being the stronger paper favourite in this setting: she beat Arystanbekova in Astana earlier in the year, and her 2026 Astana run has included straight-sets wins over Arina Arifullina and Anna Sedysheva before a three-set semi-final against Kisa Yoshioka.[1][7][16]

The historical frame matters because these lower-tier ITF markets can move sharply on venue-specific information rather than broad form. Jang’s recent results in Astana show she is at least acclimatised to the surface and conditions, while Arystanbekova’s best case is supported mainly by the prior head-to-head upset rather than broader ranking depth; the head-to-head currently favours Arystanbekova 1–0, but the earlier meeting was won by her on hard court in Astana after Jang had taken more of the baseline statistics through service pressure.[7] The market therefore reads more like a dependency trade than a pure tennis handicap: if the fixture is confirmed and completed, the sportsbook price has Jang as the shorter side, whereas the contract’s 0% YES quote suggests traders are heavily discounting normal match completion or the market is materially out of line with sports books and model-based tennis odds.[1][5]

Catalysts to watch are the official order of play, any last-minute withdrawal or walkover notice, and whether the match is actually staged inside the settlement window. Jang’s live tournament pages indicate she was still active in Astana on 8 August, so the main risk is not form but scheduling and completion, especially in a draw that can shift with court delays or same-day rescheduling.[4][1] If the match is postponed beyond seven days from the original slot without a winner, this contract settles 50-50; if it is played and produces a winner, the live result determines resolution.[1]

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page reviews ITF Astana: Su Jeong Jang vs Asylzhan Arystanbekova across five venues. The live probability is the Polymarket mid-price, sourced directly from the on-chain Polygon order book; the comparison columns benchmark each venue on fee structure, KYC, settlement currency and payment rails. Every CTA routes to Kalshi vs Polymarket, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.

Resolution & payout

Polymarket-based markets settle through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and unchallenged proposals finalise the resolution. Payouts settle automatically in USDC the moment the result is final — no bookmaker, no delay.

Kalshi-based markets settle in USD via the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse. Betfair Exchange settles in GBP/EUR net of commission. Manifold is play-money and does not pay out real funds.

FAQ

Is this market available outside the US?
Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
How does resolution work?
Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
What does Polymarket cost to trade?
Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
How reliable are the quoted odds?
The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
and

Trade ITF Astana: Su Jeong Jang vs Asylzhan Arystanbekova on Kalshi vs Polymarket

Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.

Open live market →

Related Topics

Tennis Prediction Markets