Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Kalshi vs Polymarket) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | View on Polymarket → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | View on Polymarket → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | View on Polymarket → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | View on Polymarket → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | View on Polymarket → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Wimbledon ATP: Casper Ruud vs Hubert Hurkacz Set 3 O/U 10.5 | 100% |
| Completed Match | 100% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Casper Ruud vs Hubert Hurkacz Set 3 O/U 9.5 | 100% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Casper Ruud vs Hubert Hurkacz Set 3 O/U 8.5 | 100% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Casper Ruud vs Hubert Hurkacz Set 1 O/U 8.5 | 100% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Casper Ruud vs Hubert Hurkacz Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 100% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Casper Ruud vs Hubert Hurkacz Set 1 O/U 9.5 | 100% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Casper Ruud vs Hubert Hurkacz Set Handicap +/-2.5 | 100% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Casper Ruud vs Hubert Hurkacz Set 4 O/U 8.5 | 50% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Casper Ruud vs Hubert Hurkacz Set 4 O/U 9.5 | 50% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Casper Ruud vs Hubert Hurkacz Set 4 O/U 10.5 | 50% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Casper Ruud vs Hubert Hurkacz Set 4 Winner | 50% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Casper Ruud vs Hubert Hurkacz Match O/U 36.5 | 0% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Casper Ruud vs Hubert Hurkacz Set 1 Winner | 0% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Casper Ruud vs Hubert Hurkacz | 0% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Casper Ruud vs Hubert Hurkacz Total Sets: O/U 3.5 | 0% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Casper Ruud vs Hubert Hurkacz Total Sets: O/U 4.5 | 0% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Casper Ruud vs Hubert Hurkacz Set 2 O/U 8.5 | 0% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Casper Ruud vs Hubert Hurkacz Match O/U 38.5 | 0% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Casper Ruud vs Hubert Hurkacz Set 2 O/U 9.5 | 0% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Casper Ruud vs Hubert Hurkacz Match O/U 40.5 | 0% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Casper Ruud vs Hubert Hurkacz Set 2 O/U 10.5 | 0% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Casper Ruud vs Hubert Hurkacz Set 1 O/U 10.5 | 0% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Casper Ruud vs Hubert Hurkacz Set 2 Winner | 0% |
| Wimbledon ATP: Casper Ruud vs Hubert Hurkacz Set 3 Winner | 0% |
Market context
Casper Ruud, ranked 11th, faces Hubert Hurkacz in the first round of Wimbledon 2026, originally set for 6:00 AM ET on 29 June. The match is live as of 3 PM UTC today, with Hurkacz projected as the winner by most analytics. Despite this, the prediction market titled "Wimbledon ATP: Casper Ruud vs Hubert Hurkacz" currently implies a 0% chance for Ruud to advance, a stark divergence from sportsbook lines and model consensus.
Historical precedents on grass tournaments show that zero-implied probabilities in prediction markets often signal either a technical error or a severe mispricing, especially when models assign Hurkacz a 63% win chance and bookmakers list him at $1.44 versus Ruud’s $2.75[1][2]. In past Wimbledon upsets, such as Hurkacz’s 2021 semifinal run, market odds lagged behind player form until the match began, suggesting the current 0% Ruud line may reflect a liquidity gap rather than a genuine outcome forecast[6].
Traders should monitor live score updates, set results, and any official announcements regarding match completion or cancellation, as these directly determine settlement. With Hurkacz holding 29 grass wins compared to Ruud’s five, the surface advantage is a key catalyst for the outcome[6]. Flashscore and Tennis.com are providing real-time coverage, and any delay beyond seven days without a winner would trigger a 50-50 resolution per market rules[2][5].
Methodology
Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). That keeps the comparison honest — a single canonical probability across the row, with the venue-by-venue trade-offs spelt out in the columns next to it.
Resolution & payout
Polymarket-based markets settle through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and unchallenged proposals finalise the resolution. Payouts settle automatically in USDC the moment the result is final — no bookmaker, no delay.
Kalshi-based markets settle in USD via the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse. Betfair Exchange settles in GBP/EUR net of commission. Manifold is play-money and does not pay out real funds.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is Kalshi vs Polymarket. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade Wimbledon ATP: Casper Ruud vs Hubert Hurkacz on Kalshi vs Polymarket
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →