Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Kalshi vs Polymarket) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | View on Polymarket → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | View on Polymarket → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | View on Polymarket → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | View on Polymarket → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | View on Polymarket → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Hagen: Tom Gentzsch vs Henri Squire | 100% |
| Completed Match | 100% |
| Hagen: Tom Gentzsch vs Henri Squire Set 2 Winner | 100% |
| Hagen: Tom Gentzsch vs Henri Squire Set 1 Winner | 100% |
| Hagen: Tom Gentzsch vs Henri Squire Set 1 O/U 8.5 | 100% |
| Hagen: Tom Gentzsch vs Henri Squire Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 100% |
| Hagen: Tom Gentzsch vs Henri Squire Set 2 O/U 8.5 | 100% |
| Hagen: Tom Gentzsch vs Henri Squire Match O/U 21.5 | 100% |
| Hagen: Tom Gentzsch vs Henri Squire Set 2 O/U 9.5 | 100% |
| Hagen: Tom Gentzsch vs Henri Squire Set 2 O/U 10.5 | 100% |
| Hagen: Tom Gentzsch vs Henri Squire Total Sets: O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| Hagen: Tom Gentzsch vs Henri Squire Set 1 O/U 9.5 | 0% |
| Hagen: Tom Gentzsch vs Henri Squire Match O/U 22.5 | 0% |
| Hagen: Tom Gentzsch vs Henri Squire Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 0% |
| Hagen: Tom Gentzsch vs Henri Squire Set 1 O/U 10.5 | 0% |
| Hagen: Tom Gentzsch vs Henri Squire Match O/U 23.5 | 0% |
Market context
Tom Gentzsch against Henri Squire in Hagen is priced as a near-lock on the contract, with the crowd-implied probability at 100% YES, even though the pre-match tennis market was far from a clean sweep. Bookmakers were generally around Gentzsch 1.60-1.65 and Squire 2.10-2.25, while one independent model put Gentzsch at 57% and another tipster-style preview at 63%, both pointing to a modest Gentzsch edge rather than a certainty.[1][9][16] On Polymarket, the contract showed Gentzsch at 99¢ and Squire at 1¢, which is materially tighter on the favourite than the current crowd figure and suggests the market has since absorbed either result confirmation or late-stage conviction that Gentzsch advanced.[6][12]
Historical framing favours caution with 100% pricing in tennis match contracts: Challenger-level events can still be sensitive to retirements, walkovers, scheduling shifts and score-state ambiguity, especially because settlement can flip to 50-50 if the match is not played, is tied, or is delayed beyond seven days without a winner.[1] The underlying matchup also had some baseline support for Gentzsch from the tape, with ATP ranking context around 185 versus 211 and consensus odds clustering on his side, but not at a level that would normally justify a literal certainty before play.[1][2][4] That makes the current read more consistent with a contract that is already close to or past resolution than with a pure pre-match probability.
The key catalysts are straightforward: official draw and order-of-play updates from Hagen, any late cancellation or postponement notices, and the final match result or retirement language from the tournament feed.[1][2][15] Because the market resolves on advancement, not just completion, traders should watch for whether Gentzsch is recorded as the winner on the scoring platforms and whether the result was a straight win or a retirement-induced advance, since that determines whether the settlement follows the match outcome or falls back to the contract’s 50-50 clause.[2][15]
Methodology
This page reviews Hagen: Tom Gentzsch vs Henri Squire across five venues. The live probability is the Polymarket mid-price, sourced directly from the on-chain Polygon order book; the comparison columns benchmark each venue on fee structure, KYC, settlement currency and payment rails. Every CTA routes to Kalshi vs Polymarket, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.
Resolution & payout
Polymarket-based markets settle through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and unchallenged proposals finalise the resolution. Payouts settle automatically in USDC the moment the result is final — no bookmaker, no delay.
Kalshi-based markets settle in USD via the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse. Betfair Exchange settles in GBP/EUR net of commission. Manifold is play-money and does not pay out real funds.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is Kalshi vs Polymarket. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade Hagen: Tom Gentzsch vs Henri Squire on Kalshi vs Polymarket
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →