Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Kalshi vs Polymarket) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | View on Polymarket → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | View on Polymarket → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | View on Polymarket → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | View on Polymarket → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | View on Polymarket → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| CF América 3 - 1 Portland Timbers | 100% |
| CF América 0 - 0 Portland Timbers | 0% |
| CF América 0 - 1 Portland Timbers | 0% |
| CF América 1 - 0 Portland Timbers | 0% |
| CF América 0 - 2 Portland Timbers | 0% |
| CF América 1 - 1 Portland Timbers | 0% |
| CF América 2 - 0 Portland Timbers | 0% |
| CF América 0 - 3 Portland Timbers | 0% |
| CF América 1 - 2 Portland Timbers | 0% |
| CF América 2 - 1 Portland Timbers | 0% |
| CF América 3 - 0 Portland Timbers | 0% |
| CF América 1 - 3 Portland Timbers | 0% |
| CF América 2 - 2 Portland Timbers | 0% |
| CF América 2 - 3 Portland Timbers | 0% |
| CF América 3 - 2 Portland Timbers | 0% |
| CF América 3 - 3 Portland Timbers | 0% |
| Any Other Score | 0% |
Market context
CF América’s Leagues Cup meeting with the Portland Timbers is priced in the market as effectively impossible to land on a specific listed scoreline, with the crowd-implied probability at 0% YES. That is at odds with the broader match context: recent head-to-head records show América unbeaten in the last three meetings, including a 1-1 draw in 2025 and a 3-1 win in 2021, while current form pages also point to both clubs arriving with goals in their latest tournament games. ESPN’s match listings show América and Portland each scored multiple goals in their most recent Leagues Cup outings, which usually matters more for an exact-score contract than the outright winner market.[11][13][15][17]
For historical framing, exact-score markets are usually far less forgiving than moneyline or even total-goals bets, because one late goal can shift the contract from a near-hit to “Any Other Score”. The closest comparable results in this fixture have been 1-1, 3-1 and 1-1 again across the recent sample, which implies a narrow cluster around draw-or-one-goal-margin outcomes rather than a truly outlier scoreline.[3][11][13][17] On that basis, a 0% YES price suggests the contract line is materially different from simple football consensus, where analysts and score trackers still frame the game as one with live scoring potential rather than a dead cert for an excluded outcome.[5][14]
Traders should watch the confirmed line-ups, venue and any schedule changes through the settlement window, because this market resolves only on the score after 90 minutes plus stoppage time. The most important catalyst is whether either side rotates heavily after a congested Leagues Cup schedule, since América and Portland both played tournament matches in the days before this fixture and recent results indicate they have both been productive in attack.[15][17] If the match is delayed or rescheduled, the contract remains open until completion, so the relevant live risk is not just the result itself but whether the game proceeds exactly as planned within the settlement period.
Methodology
We track CF América vs. Portland Timbers - Exact Score across the five venues with material prediction-market liquidity. The probability shown is the live Polymarket mid; the comparison rows summarise how each venue treats the underlying contract — fees, KYC thresholds, settlement currency, deposit options. The highlighted row marks the cheapest route into Polymarket's order book.
Resolution & payout
Polymarket-based markets settle through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and unchallenged proposals finalise the resolution. Payouts settle automatically in USDC the moment the result is final — no bookmaker, no delay.
Kalshi-based markets settle in USD via the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse. Betfair Exchange settles in GBP/EUR net of commission. Manifold is play-money and does not pay out real funds.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is Kalshi vs Polymarket. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade CF América vs. Portland Timbers - Exact Score on Kalshi vs Polymarket
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →