Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Kalshi vs Polymarket) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | View on Polymarket → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | View on Polymarket → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | View on Polymarket → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | View on Polymarket → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | View on Polymarket → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Fight won by KO/TKO? | 100% |
| Miller to win by KO/TKO? | 100% |
| O/U 0.5 Rounds | 100% |
| O/U 1.5 Rounds | 100% |
| Billy Ray Goff vs. Ty Miller | 0% |
| Fight to Go the Distance? | 0% |
| Goff to win by KO/TKO? | 0% |
| Fight won by submission? | 0% |
| O/U 2.5 Rounds | 0% |
Market context
Billy Ray Goff’s welterweight bout with Ty Miller sits in the usual spot where the sportsbook, the prediction market, and the wider preview consensus can diverge, but not dramatically on the favourite. UFC Stats lists Miller at 7-0-0 with one no contest and Goff at 9-4-0, while UFC calendar and sportsbook aggregation pages show Miller around **81% implied win probability** at roughly **-400 to -435**, with Goff in the low-20s at about **+310 to +376**.[4][11][13] By contrast, the current crowd-implied probability at **0% YES** is effectively pricing Goff as a longshot, which is far below the market range implied by bookmakers and preview models.[11][13][14] That gap is the key comparison point: on paper, the broader market expects Miller, but the contract is trading as if Goff has almost no path.
Comparable UFC betting profiles suggest why that may be overdone. Goff lands **7.16 significant strikes per minute** with **38-39% accuracy**, while Miller lands **7.51 per minute** at **46% accuracy**; Goff also absorbs fewer strikes per minute on paper, but Miller’s 77-inch reach, undefeated record, and decision-heavy profile have driven most model and analyst picks towards him.[4][9][14][15][16] Goff’s wins are mostly by stoppage, with **7 KO/TKO wins**, whereas Miller’s are more balanced, with **4 decision wins** and **2 finishes**, which matters because a volatile striking fight can compress underdog odds more than a clean pre-fight read suggests.[1][2][3]
The main catalysts to watch are official bout status and any late-card reshuffles, because this market resolves only off UFC’s official result and can flip to **50-50** if the bout is ruled a no contest, not scored, cancelled, or pushed beyond **22 August 2026**.[Market description] If weigh-in, medical, or scheduling issues force a change, prediction-market pricing could move faster than sportsbook numbers, which are typically updated in batches.[11][13] A recent UFC preview consensus still points to Miller, so any meaningful narrowing from the current 0% YES would likely need fresh information on opponent replacement risk, missed weight, or a late change to the bout’s status rather than a pure re-rating of the matchup itself.[14][15]
Live Data & Statistics
Live stats load when the match begins. Current market odds are shown above. Trading volume: $769K.
Methodology
This page reviews UFC Fight Night: Billy Ray Goff vs. Ty Miller (Welterweight, Prelims) across five venues. The live probability is the Polymarket mid-price, sourced directly from the on-chain Polygon order book; the comparison columns benchmark each venue on fee structure, KYC, settlement currency and payment rails. Every CTA routes to Kalshi vs Polymarket, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.
Resolution & payout
Polymarket-based markets settle through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and unchallenged proposals finalise the resolution. Payouts settle automatically in USDC the moment the result is final — no bookmaker, no delay.
Kalshi-based markets settle in USD via the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse. Betfair Exchange settles in GBP/EUR net of commission. Manifold is play-money and does not pay out real funds.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is Kalshi vs Polymarket. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- Do I need to KYC for this market?
- On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like Kalshi vs Polymarket trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.
Trade UFC Fight Night: Billy Ray Goff vs. Ty Miller (Welte… on Kalshi vs Polymarket
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →