Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Kalshi vs Polymarket) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | View on Polymarket → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | View on Polymarket → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | View on Polymarket → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | View on Polymarket → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | View on Polymarket → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| O/U 1.5 | 100% |
| O/U 2.5 | 100% |
| Both Teams to Score | 100% |
| Both Teams to Score in First Half | 100% |
| 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 100% |
| Larne FC O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| Larne FC O/U 1.5 | 100% |
| Tre Fiori FC O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| Larne FC 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| Tre Fiori FC 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| Larne FC 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| Larne FC (-1.5) | 0% |
| Tre Fiori FC (-1.5) | 0% |
| Larne FC (-2.5) | 0% |
| Tre Fiori FC (-2.5) | 0% |
| O/U 3.5 | 0% |
| O/U 4.5 | 0% |
| O/U 5.5 | 0% |
| 1st Half O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| Larne FC O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| Tre Fiori FC O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| Tre Fiori FC O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| Larne FC 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| Tre Fiori FC 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| Both Teams to Score in Second Half | 0% |
| 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| 2nd Half O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| Larne FC 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| Tre Fiori FC 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| Tre Fiori FC 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
Market context
The UEFA Champions League first qualifying round clash between Tre Fiori and Larne FC is scheduled for 14 July, with bookmakers heavily favouring the Irish side for an away victory. All major sportsbooks price the away win at approximately 1.22, implying a 77% probability, while predictive algorithms converge on a Larne win with scorelines ranging from 0-2 to 1-3[1][2]. This overwhelming external consensus creates a stark divergence against the current prediction-market implied probability of 0% YES for the “More Markets” contract, suggesting either a mispricing on the platform or a specific contract definition that excludes standard match outcomes.
Historically, such extreme divergences between sportsbook lines and prediction-market probabilities in early-round Champions League fixtures often signal a mismatch in contract scope rather than a genuine disagreement on match outcome. In comparable cases involving first-leg qualifiers, prediction markets have occasionally assigned near-zero probabilities to “more markets” contracts when the underlying event is perceived as a one-sided affair where ancillary betting options (such as specific goal thresholds or half-time spreads) are unlikely to trigger[5]. The 0% YES figure here likely reflects trader confidence that the “more markets” condition will not be met, despite Larne’s clear dominance in the win/draw/win market.
Traders should monitor the official UEFA match report for confirmation of the final score and any disqualifications or cancellations that could void ancillary markets. Recent analysis from TipIQ projects a 1-3 win for Larne, reinforcing the expectation of a high-margin victory that may not satisfy specific “more markets” criteria if they require narrow goal differentials or specific half-time outcomes[2]. No new team announcements or lineup changes have been reported since the initial odds release, meaning the primary catalyst remains the match result itself, which is heavily skewed toward an away win.
Methodology
We track Larne FC vs. Tre Fiori FC - More Markets across the five venues with material prediction-market liquidity. The probability shown is the live Polymarket mid; the comparison rows summarise how each venue treats the underlying contract — fees, KYC thresholds, settlement currency, deposit options. The highlighted row marks the cheapest route into Polymarket's order book.
Resolution & payout
Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.
Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is Kalshi vs Polymarket. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade Larne FC vs. Tre Fiori FC - More Markets on Kalshi vs Polymarket
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →