Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Kalshi vs Polymarket) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | View on Polymarket → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | View on Polymarket → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | View on Polymarket → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | View on Polymarket → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | View on Polymarket → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Fluminense FC 1 - 3 CR Vasco da Gama | 100% |
| Fluminense FC 0 - 0 CR Vasco da Gama | 0% |
| Fluminense FC 0 - 1 CR Vasco da Gama | 0% |
| Fluminense FC 1 - 0 CR Vasco da Gama | 0% |
| Fluminense FC 0 - 2 CR Vasco da Gama | 0% |
| Fluminense FC 1 - 1 CR Vasco da Gama | 0% |
| Fluminense FC 2 - 0 CR Vasco da Gama | 0% |
| Fluminense FC 0 - 3 CR Vasco da Gama | 0% |
| Fluminense FC 1 - 2 CR Vasco da Gama | 0% |
| Fluminense FC 2 - 1 CR Vasco da Gama | 0% |
| Fluminense FC 3 - 0 CR Vasco da Gama | 0% |
| Fluminense FC 2 - 2 CR Vasco da Gama | 0% |
| Fluminense FC 3 - 1 CR Vasco da Gama | 0% |
| Fluminense FC 2 - 3 CR Vasco da Gama | 0% |
| Fluminense FC 3 - 2 CR Vasco da Gama | 0% |
| Fluminense FC 3 - 3 CR Vasco da Gama | 0% |
| Any Other Score | 0% |
Market context
Fluminense’s meeting with Vasco da Gama is being priced in the market as a very low-probability exact-score event, with the crowd at **0% YES**, which usually points to either a thin order book or strong scepticism that the listed scoreline is the most likely outcome. That sits in contrast with conventional football pricing, where outright exact-score markets are typically fragmented across several low-percentage outcomes rather than clustered around a single result; for this fixture, recent pre-match odds from comparable meetings have still favoured Fluminense, while the draw and a narrow Vasco win have also been live possibilities. In May 2025, for example, one comparable league match finished Fluminense 2-1 Vasco, which is the kind of modest-margin result that often pulls probability away from clean 1-0 or 2-0 assumptions.[17][20]
The historical frame is a derby with enough volatility to keep exact scores hard to pin down. Across head-to-head datasets, Vasco lead Fluminense on wins in the broader sample, but the split is close and draws are frequent, with one source showing 14 Vasco wins, 10 Fluminense wins and 7 draws in 31 meetings, while another larger sample shows 22 Vasco wins, 16 Fluminense wins and 21 draws in 59 matches.[3][19] Recent Copa do Brasil knockout ties between the sides also underline the range of possible regulation-time scores: in December 2025, the teams traded a 2-1 Vasco result and a 1-0 Fluminense result, with the latter decided on penalties after 90 minutes and stoppage time.[2][13]
For traders, the key catalyst is the match itself and any late-team news that affects tempo, not extra time or penalties, because this contract settles only on the regulation score.[13] Given the settlement window extends until 00:30 UTC on 6 August 2026, any postponement would keep the market open until the fixture is completed, so official confirmation of kick-off, venue and team sheets will matter more than headline competition context.[1][13] Any meaningful divergence between sportsbook lines and prediction-market pricing is most likely to come from the same place: whether lineups point to a cautious first leg, a more open derby, or a scoreline that makes “Any Other Score” look more realistic than the contract’s listed outcomes.[1][20]
Methodology
Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). That keeps the comparison honest — a single canonical probability across the row, with the venue-by-venue trade-offs spelt out in the columns next to it.
Resolution & payout
At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.
On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.
FAQ
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- Do I need to KYC for this market?
- On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like Kalshi vs Polymarket trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade Fluminense FC vs. CR Vasco da Gama - Exact Score on Kalshi vs Polymarket
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →