Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Kalshi vs Polymarket) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
85% | 15% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | View on Polymarket → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
85% | 15% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | View on Polymarket → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | View on Polymarket → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | View on Polymarket → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | View on Polymarket → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| O/U 39.5 | 85% |
| O/U 35.5 | 84% |
| O/U 37.5 | 83% |
| O/U 41.5 | 83% |
| O/U 43.5 | 83% |
| 4Q O/U 7.5 | 83% |
| 2Q O/U 7.5 | 82% |
| Maryland O/U 23.5 | 75% |
| O/U 45.5 | 74% |
| O/U 47.5 | 73% |
| 2Q O/U 10.5 | 71% |
| 4Q O/U 10.5 | 70% |
| Rutgers O/U 20.5 | 69% |
| 1Q Moneyline | 68% |
| O/U 49.5 | 66% |
| Spread -0.5 | 65% |
| 3Q O/U 7.5 | 65% |
| Spread -1.5 | 64% |
| O/U 51.5 | 64% |
| 2Q O/U 13.5 | 64% |
| 1Q O/U 7.5 | 63% |
| Spread -2.5 | 62% |
| 4Q O/U 13.5 | 62% |
| 1H Spread -0.5 | 59% |
| O/U 53.5 | 57% |
| Rutgers O/U 23.5 | 57% |
| Maryland 2H O/U 12.5 | 57% |
| Maryland O/U 29.5 | 56% |
| Spread -3.5 | 55% |
| 1H Spread -2.5 | 55% |
| 2H Spread -0.5 | 55% |
| Spread -4.5 | 53% |
| Rutgers 2H O/U 11.5 | 53% |
| 1H O/U 27.5 | 52% |
| Spread -5.5 | 51% |
| O/U 55.5 | 51% |
| 2Q O/U 16.5 | 51% |
| 3Q O/U 10.5 | 51% |
| 2Q Spread -0.5 | 51% |
| 1H O/U 21.5 | 50% |
| 1H O/U 24.5 | 50% |
| 2H O/U 21.5 | 50% |
| 2H O/U 24.5 | 50% |
| 2H O/U 33.5 | 50% |
| 1Q O/U 10.5 | 50% |
| Maryland O/U 26.5 | 50% |
| Maryland O/U 32.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers 1H O/U 11.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers 1H O/U 15.5 | 50% |
| Maryland 1H O/U 12.5 | 50% |
| Maryland 1H O/U 14.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers 2H O/U 13.5 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q1 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - 1H | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q4 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q2 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - 2H | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q3 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown | 50% |
| Kickoff or Punt Return Touchdown | 50% |
| Pick-Six Scored | 50% |
| Rutgers Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Maryland Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Maryland Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Maryland Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Total Passing Yards: O/U 200.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Total Passing Yards: O/U 225.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Total Passing Yards: O/U 250.5 | 50% |
| Maryland Total Passing Yards: O/U 250.5 | 50% |
| Maryland Total Passing Yards: O/U 225.5 | 50% |
| Maryland Total Passing Yards: O/U 200.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Total Rushing Yards: O/U 125.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Total Rushing Yards: O/U 150.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Total Rushing Yards: O/U 175.5 | 50% |
| Maryland Total Rushing Yards: O/U 125.5 | 50% |
| Maryland Total Rushing Yards: O/U 150.5 | 50% |
| Maryland Total Rushing Yards: O/U 175.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 350.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 375.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 400.5 | 50% |
| Maryland Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 350.5 | 50% |
| Maryland Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 375.5 | 50% |
| Maryland Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 400.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Maryland 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Maryland 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Field Goals Made: O/U 2.5 | 50% |
| Maryland Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Maryland Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Maryland Field Goals Made: O/U 2.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Total Receptions: O/U 14.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Total Receptions: O/U 19.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Total Receptions: O/U 24.5 | 50% |
| Maryland Total Receptions: O/U 14.5 | 50% |
| Maryland Total Receptions: O/U 19.5 | 50% |
| Maryland Total Receptions: O/U 24.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Total First Downs: O/U 19.5 | 50% |
| Maryland Total First Downs: O/U 19.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Total First Downs: O/U 21.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Total First Downs: O/U 23.5 | 50% |
| Maryland Total First Downs: O/U 21.5 | 50% |
| Maryland Total First Downs: O/U 23.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers vs. Maryland: Total 4th Down Conversions O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers vs. Maryland: Total Successful Two-Point Conversions O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| 2H Spread -2.5 | 50% |
| 1Q Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 1Q Spread -0.5 | 50% |
| 2Q Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 2Q Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 2Q Spread -2.5 | 50% |
| 2Q Spread -5.5 | 50% |
| 3Q Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 3Q Spread -5.5 | 50% |
| 4Q Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 4Q Spread -5.5 | 50% |
| 2H Moneyline | 50% |
| 2Q Moneyline | 50% |
| 3Q Moneyline | 50% |
| 4Q Moneyline | 50% |
| 2H O/U 27.5 | 49% |
| Rutgers O/U 26.5 | 48% |
| Rutgers Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 | 48% |
| 1H Spread -3.5 | 48% |
| 1Q Spread -1.5 | 48% |
| 3Q Spread -1.5 | 48% |
| 4Q Spread -0.5 | 48% |
| O/U 57.5 | 47% |
| 1Q O/U 13.5 | 47% |
| 3Q O/U 13.5 | 47% |
| Rutgers 2H O/U 15.5 | 47% |
| 2H Spread -3.5 | 47% |
| 1Q Spread -0.5 | 47% |
| Spread -6.5 | 46% |
| Rutgers 1H O/U 13.5 | 46% |
| Maryland 2H O/U 14.5 | 46% |
| 3Q Spread -0.5 | 46% |
| Both Teams to Score Points - Q2 | 45% |
| 4Q O/U 16.5 | 44% |
| Maryland 1H O/U 16.5 | 44% |
| 1H O/U 30.5 | 43% |
| Both Teams to Score Points - Q4 | 43% |
| Rutgers vs. Maryland: Total Touchdowns O/U 5.5 | 43% |
| 1H Spread -4.5 | 43% |
| 3Q Spread -2.5 | 43% |
| 4Q Spread -1.5 | 43% |
| Maryland 2H O/U 16.5 | 42% |
| 1H Spread -5.5 | 42% |
| 2H Spread -4.5 | 42% |
| 4Q Spread -2.5 | 42% |
| O/U 59.5 | 41% |
| 2Q Spread -3.5 | 41% |
| Maryland O/U 3.5 | 41% |
| Spread -7.5 | 40% |
| Spread -8.5 | 40% |
| 2H Spread -5.5 | 40% |
| 2Q O/U 19.5 | 39% |
| Rutgers vs. Maryland: Total Touchdowns O/U 6.5 | 39% |
| 1Q Spread -3.5 | 38% |
| 1H Moneyline | 38% |
| 1H O/U 33.5 | 37% |
| 2H O/U 30.5 | 37% |
| 4Q O/U 19.5 | 37% |
| Rutgers vs. Maryland | 36% |
| O/U 61.5 | 36% |
| 3Q Spread -3.5 | 36% |
| Spread -0.5 | 35% |
| O/U 63.5 | 35% |
| Maryland O/U 35.5 | 35% |
| Both Teams to Score Points - Q1 | 35% |
| Both Teams to Score Points - Q3 | 35% |
| 4Q Spread -3.5 | 35% |
| Spread -10.5 | 34% |
| Spread -1.5 | 33% |
| Rutgers vs. Maryland: Total Defensive/Special Teams Touchdowns O/U 0.5 | 32% |
| 2H Spread -7.5 | 32% |
| Rutgers O/U 3.5 | 32% |
| Rutgers vs. Maryland: Total Touchdowns O/U 7.5 | 31% |
| 1H Spread -7.5 | 31% |
| Spread -2.5 | 30% |
| O/U 65.5 | 30% |
| 3Q O/U 16.5 | 30% |
| Spread -13.5 | 28% |
| 1Q O/U 16.5 | 28% |
| Rutgers O/U 32.5 | 28% |
| O/U 67.5 | 27% |
| Game Goes to Overtime | 27% |
| Spread -14.5 | 26% |
| Spread -20.5 | 25% |
| Spread -3.5 | 25% |
| 1Q Spread -3.5 | 25% |
| Spread -4.5 | 23% |
| Spread -5.5 | 22% |
| Spread -16.5 | 22% |
| O/U 69.5 | 21% |
| 3Q O/U 19.5 | 21% |
| Rutgers O/U 29.5 | 21% |
| Spread -6.5 | 20% |
| Spread -17.5 | 20% |
| O/U 71.5 | 18% |
| 1Q O/U 19.5 | 18% |
| Spread -7.5 | 17% |
| Spread -20.5 | 16% |
| Spread -8.5 | 15% |
| O/U 75.5 | 15% |
| Spread -10.5 | 13% |
| O/U 73.5 | 13% |
| Spread -13.5 | 9% |
| Spread -14.5 | 8% |
| Spread -16.5 | 7% |
| Spread -17.5 | 5% |
Market context
Market consensus: 85% chance of rutgers vs. maryland. Prediction markets aggregate real capital to produce this probability signal. In the upcoming college football game between Rutgers and Maryland, scheduled for October 17 at 12:30PM ET: This market will resolve to "Rutgers" if Rutgers win the game. This mark…
Live Data & Statistics
Live stats load when the match begins. Current market odds are shown above. Trading volume: $94K.
Methodology
Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). That keeps the comparison honest — a single canonical probability across the row, with the venue-by-venue trade-offs spelt out in the columns next to it.
Resolution & payout
Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.
Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is Kalshi vs Polymarket. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- Do I need to KYC for this market?
- On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like Kalshi vs Polymarket trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.
Trade Rutgers vs. Maryland on Kalshi vs Polymarket
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →