🎁 New traders: 100% Deposit Match up to $500 · 0% fees · instant USDC payoutsClaim it →
Skip to main content
HomeGuideCryptoMarketsBlogView on Polymarket →

Los Angeles Mayoral Election

Live odds for "Los Angeles Mayoral Election" pulled from the Polygon order book, alongside the platform attributes of every venue that runs this contract.

Karen Bass 68% Nithya Raman 32% Rick Caruso 0% Asaad Alnajjar 0% Volume: $13.3M Liquidity: $220K Closes: 31 Dec 2026
Open live market →
Los Angeles Mayoral Election

Platform comparison

PlatformYES oddsNO oddsFeeKYCSettlement
Polymarket (via Kalshi vs Polymarket) Pick
polygram.ink (preferred broker)
68% 32% 0% (USDC on-chain) No-KYC up to $1,500 USDC, auto via UMA oracle View on Polymarket →
Polymarket (direct)
polymarket.com
68% 32% 0% Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU USDC, on-chain View on Polymarket →
Kalshi
kalshi.com
Up to 7% per trade US-only, KYC required USD View on Polymarket →
Betfair Exchange
betfair.com
2-5% commission Full KYC from first trade GBP / EUR View on Polymarket →
Manifold Markets
manifold.markets
Play-money (mana) None — play-money Mana (no cash-out) View on Polymarket →

Outcome probabilities

Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.

OutcomeProbability
Karen Bass68%
Nithya Raman32%
Rick Caruso0%
Asaad Alnajjar0%
Gina Viola0%
Other0%
Spencer Pratt0%
Austin Beutner0%
Lindsey Horvath0%
Monica Rodriguez0%
Rae Huang0%
Adam Miller0%
Candidate H0%
Candidate I0%
Candidate J0%

Market context

The 2026 Los Angeles mayoral race is a two-stage contest, with the June primary already pointing to a November runoff after no candidate cleared a majority; certified results showed Karen Bass on 34.3%, Nithya Raman on 29.0% and Spencer Pratt on 25.5%. [11] The current crowd-implied 67% YES on the market is therefore best read as a view that Bass is still the most likely winner, but not as a forecast of an easy outright win; the real question is whether she consolidates enough support in a fragmented field to prevail in the runoff. [11][17] That leaves the contract more in line with a modest favourite than a near-lock, especially given the size of the field and the fact that the initial vote share was split across several credible challengers. [11]

Historical comparables suggest caution with front-runner pricing in Los Angeles: earlier polling before the primary had Bass, Raman and Pratt clustered within the margin of error, and undecided voters were still a material block in late May. [2][6][13] In that sense, a mid-60s probability on Bass looks broadly consistent with an analyst consensus that she leads, but it is not a dominant position; a reading much above 70% would imply stronger certainty than the polling and first-round vote share justified. [2][11][13] Compared with a hypothetical sportsbook-style line, the market price appears to reflect some runoff risk and candidate volatility rather than a simple endorsement of the incumbent’s name recognition. [11][2]

Traders should watch for two catalysts: any formal endorsements, withdrawals or coalition signals after the primary, and the cadence of runoff campaigning once the field narrows. [11][17] The settlement source also matters here, because the market will resolve on a consensus of credible reporting but fall back on official City of Los Angeles information if the result is disputed or delayed, so certification timing and any recount chatter could affect near-term pricing. [20][11] If campaign coverage shows Bass holding together her first-round coalition while the opposition consolidates less effectively, the 67% level may look conservative; if the runoff becomes a sharper anti-incumbent contest, the implied probability could compress quickly.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

We track Los Angeles Mayoral Election across the five venues with material prediction-market liquidity. The probability shown is the live Polymarket mid; the comparison rows summarise how each venue treats the underlying contract — fees, KYC thresholds, settlement currency, deposit options. The highlighted row marks the cheapest route into Polymarket's order book.

Resolution & payout

At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.

On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.

FAQ

Is this market available outside the US?
Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
How does resolution work?
Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
What does Polymarket cost to trade?
Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
How reliable are the quoted odds?
The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
and

Trade Los Angeles Mayoral Election on Kalshi vs Polymarket

Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.

Open live market →