Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Kalshi vs Polymarket) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
74% | 26% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | View on Polymarket → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
74% | 26% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | View on Polymarket → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | View on Polymarket → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | View on Polymarket → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | View on Polymarket → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 4? | 74% |
| Game Handicap: T1 (-1.5) vs G2 Esports (+1.5) | 71% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 2? | 63% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 3? | 61% |
| O/U 3.5 Games | 59% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 1? | 56% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 52% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 51% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 51% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 51% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 51% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 51% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 51% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 51% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 51% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 51% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 51% |
| First Blood in Game 1? | 51% |
| First Blood in Game 2? | 51% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| First Blood in Game 3? | 50% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 49% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 49% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 49% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 49% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 49% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 49% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 49% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 49% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 49% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 49% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 49% |
| First Blood in Game 4? | 49% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 1? | 43% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 3? | 43% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 2? | 42% |
| Game Handicap: T1 (-2.5) vs G2 Esports (+2.5) | 41% |
| Game 4 Winner | 36% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 4? | 31% |
| Game 2 Winner | 30% |
| Game 3 Winner | 30% |
| Game 1 Winner | 28% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 27% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 27% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 26% |
| O/U 4.5 Games | 25% |
| Match Winner | 14% |
Market context
G2 Esports and T1 face off in the lower-bracket quarterfinal 2 of the Mid-Season Invitational Playoffs, a League of Legends match scheduled for 4:00 AM ET on 8 July 2026. The prediction market currently implies a 28% chance that G2 wins, while Strafe’s community votes heavily favour T1 at 69.4% [2]. This divergence mirrors historical patterns where T1’s dominance in MSI history often overshadows G2’s occasional breakthroughs, such as their 3–1 victory in 2022 [4]. Over the last decade, T1 has won seven matches against G2, with G2 securing only three wins, the most recent being a 1–0 result in November 2025 [2].
Traders should monitor official MSI 2026 updates for any schedule shifts or roster announcements, as delays beyond seven days would reset the market to 50–50. Liquipedia confirms the match is set for 17:00 KST on 8 July, but GosuGamers notes live score availability may depend on real-time streaming stability [6][7]. Recent post-match discussions from MSI 2022 highlight T1’s ability to win games rapidly, including a record-fast game 3 against G2 [9]. With T1’s consistent performance in high-stakes MSI matches and G2’s reliance on narrow victories, the 28% implied probability appears conservative relative to analyst consensus and community sentiment.
Methodology
This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote, four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to Kalshi vs Polymarket, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.
Resolution & payout
At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.
On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.
FAQ
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- Do I need to KYC for this market?
- On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like Kalshi vs Polymarket trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.
Trade LoL: G2 Esports vs T1 (BO5) - Mid-Season Invitationa… on Kalshi vs Polymarket
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →