Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Kalshi vs Polymarket) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | View on Polymarket → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | View on Polymarket → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | View on Polymarket → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | View on Polymarket → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | View on Polymarket → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| First Blood in Game 2? | 100% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 90% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 2? | 72% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 2? | 70% |
| Game 2 Winner | 56% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 51% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 51% |
| Game Handicap: DK (-1.5) vs G2 Esports (+1.5) | 51% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 50% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 50% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 50% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 50% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 50% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 36.5 in Game 2? | 50% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 27.5 in Game 2? | 50% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 39.5 in Game 2? | 50% |
| O/U 2.5 Games | 47% |
| Match Winner | 25% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 10% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 10% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 10% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 10% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 10% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 36.5 in Game 1? | 10% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 27.5 in Game 1? | 10% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 24.5 in Game 1? | 5% |
| First Blood in Game 1? | 1% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 1? | 1% |
| Game 1 Winner | 0% |
| Game Handicap: G2 (-1.5) vs Dplus KIA (+1.5) | 0% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 1? | 0% |
Market context
G2 Esports faces Dplus KIA in the League of Legends Lower Bracket final of the Esports World Cup Group A, a match scheduled for 9:50 AM ET on 16 July. The crowd-implied probability of G2 winning sits at 14%, suggesting the market heavily favours the Korean side despite G2’s recent pedigree.
Historical head-to-head data offers a stark contrast to current pricing: at the 2023 World Championship Swiss Round, G2 Esports defeated Dplus KIA in 42 minutes, with Hans Sama earning MVP honours [1]. That result demonstrates G2’s capacity to dismantle top-tier Korean opposition, yet the current 14% line implies a significant shift in team form or roster stability since that encounter. In prediction markets, such divergence from historical dominance often signals unpublicised roster changes or meta-adaptation issues rather than a pure skill gap, a pattern seen when sportsbook lines lag behind real-time analyst consensus on team health.
Traders should monitor official Esports World Cup announcements for any roster swaps or delay notices before the settlement window closes on 16 July at 19:50 UTC. The match’s resolution depends on completion; if delayed beyond seven days or cancelled, the market resolves to 50-50. Recent tournament schedules indicate tight turnaround times between Group A matches, increasing the risk of logistical delays that could trigger the tie condition. No major roster announcements have surfaced in the last 24 hours, but the absence of a confirmed starting lineup for G2 remains a critical dependency for the 14% probability to hold.
Sources: 1
Methodology
We track LoL: G2 Esports vs Dplus KIA (BO3) - Esports World Cup Group A across the five venues with material prediction-market liquidity. The probability shown is the live Polymarket mid; the comparison rows summarise how each venue treats the underlying contract — fees, KYC thresholds, settlement currency, deposit options. The highlighted row marks the cheapest route into Polymarket's order book.
Resolution & payout
At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.
On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is Kalshi vs Polymarket. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- Do I need to KYC for this market?
- On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like Kalshi vs Polymarket trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade LoL: G2 Esports vs Dplus KIA (BO3) - Esports World C… on Kalshi vs Polymarket
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →