Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Kalshi vs Polymarket) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
77% | 23% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | View on Polymarket → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
77% | 23% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | View on Polymarket → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | View on Polymarket → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | View on Polymarket → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | View on Polymarket → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 77% |
| O/U 3.5 Games | 73% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 3? | 64% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 62% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 62% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 1? | 56% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 2? | 56% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 54% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 51% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 51% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 51% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 51% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 51% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 51% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 51% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 51% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 51% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 51% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 51% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| First Blood in Game 3? | 50% |
| First Blood in Game 2? | 50% |
| First Blood in Game 4? | 50% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 4? | 50% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 4? | 50% |
| Game 4 Winner | 49% |
| First Blood in Game 1? | 49% |
| Game 1 Winner | 48% |
| Game 2 Winner | 48% |
| Game 3 Winner | 48% |
| Match Winner | 46% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 46% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 45% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 38% |
| O/U 4.5 Games | 37% |
| Game Handicap: T1 (-1.5) vs Bilibili Gaming (+1.5) | 37% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 37% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 37% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 37% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 37% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 2? | 37% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 36% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 35% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 3? | 34% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 1? | 34% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 26% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 21% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 20% |
| Game Handicap: T1 (-2.5) vs Bilibili Gaming (+2.5) | 18% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 11% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 6% |
Market context
Bilibili Gaming and T1 face off in the Upper Bracket quarterfinal 1 of the Mid-Season Invitational Playoffs, a five-game series scheduled for 4:00 AM ET on 4 July. The current crowd-implied probability of 48% favouring Bilibili Gaming suggests a tightly contested match, yet this diverges meaningfully from other platforms. Strafe users, for instance, heavily back T1 with 74.2% of votes, while T1’s recent 3-0 victory over Bilibili Gaming in their last encounter on 5 July 2025 reinforces their dominance in this specific matchup[2].
Historical precedents from the 2025 MSI show T1 advancing to the Upper Bracket Finals while Bilibili Gaming fell to the Lower Bracket, a pattern that tempers the optimism surrounding the Chinese side[3]. Such outcomes frame the current 48% probability as potentially underweighting T1’s international pedigree, particularly with Faker’s leadership and their dramatic 3-2 Fearless Draft qualifier win over Gen.G[1]. Traders should monitor official roster announcements and any schedule adjustments before the match begins, as dependencies on player availability could shift odds rapidly. Recent coverage confirms T1’s strong play-in stage performance, which may influence market sentiment as the settlement window closes on 4 July 2026[8].
Methodology
This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote, four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to Kalshi vs Polymarket, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.
Resolution & payout
At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.
On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is Kalshi vs Polymarket. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- Do I need to KYC for this market?
- On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like Kalshi vs Polymarket trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.
Trade LoL: Bilibili Gaming vs T1 (BO5) - Mid-Season Invita… on Kalshi vs Polymarket
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →