Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Kalshi vs Polymarket) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | View on Polymarket → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | View on Polymarket → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | View on Polymarket → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | View on Polymarket → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | View on Polymarket → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Game 1 Winner | 100% |
| O/U 2.5 Games | 100% |
| Ends in Daytime | 100% |
| Both Teams Beat Roshan | 100% |
| Both Teams Destroy Barracks | 100% |
| Ends in Daytime | 100% |
| Game 2 Winner | 0% |
| Match Winner | 0% |
| Game Handicap: LYNX (-1.5) vs PuckChamp (+1.5) | 0% |
| Ends in Daytime | 0% |
| Both Teams Beat Roshan | 0% |
| Both Teams Destroy Barracks | 0% |
| Any Player Ultra Kill | 0% |
| Any Player Rampage | 0% |
| Any Player Ultra Kill | 0% |
| Any Player Rampage | 0% |
| Both Teams Beat Roshan | 0% |
| Both Teams Destroy Barracks | 0% |
| Any Player Ultra Kill | 0% |
| Any Player Rampage | 0% |
| Game Handicap: PckCp (-1.5) vs Team Lynx (+1.5) | 0% |
Market context
PuckChamp’s best-of-three against Team Lynx in the Asgard Championship Playoffs was due to be played as an upper-bracket quarter-final, with live listings placing the start at 18:00 UTC on 7 August and several match pages still treating it as active rather than completed. That matters for interpretation because a contract priced at **100% YES** is effectively assuming the match has already been decided in PuckChamp’s favour, or that there is market inertia from stale data rather than fresh betting. Public esports pages instead lean towards a far narrower matchup: Strafe’s community vote has PuckChamp around **94.8%** of picks, while Polymarket’s own event page describes PuckChamp and Team Lynx as entering with mixed recent form rather than a one-sided mismatch.[1][5][8][10]
Comparable form data suggests the market is reading a recent head-to-head edge more than a clean team-quality gap. Strafe notes PuckChamp beat Team Lynx **2-0** in their last meeting on 20 July, and Liquipedia’s recent results show PuckChamp with a patchy run in late July while Lynx had some stronger single-series results, albeit against different opposition.[5][20] Ranking snapshots are also not uniform across sources: GosuGamers lists Team Lynx above PuckChamp in world ranking, while other trackers show a smaller gap or different placements, which is typical in lower-tier online Dota where roster changes and sparse LAN data can make rankings volatile.[2][12]
For traders, the key catalysts are straightforward: an official result feed, a confirmed start status, and any evidence the series is live, delayed, abandoned, or rescheduled beyond the market’s seven-day settlement rule. If the match never starts or is voided, the contract should not settle as a normal PuckChamp win; if play begins but is not completed, completion status and series winner become decisive under the market terms. Cross-platform divergence is therefore less about analyst disagreement than about whether the event page is reflecting a finished result, an in-progress BO3, or outdated pre-match pricing.[1][14][16]
Methodology
Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). That keeps the comparison honest — a single canonical probability across the row, with the venue-by-venue trade-offs spelt out in the columns next to it.
Resolution & payout
Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.
Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.
FAQ
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
Trade Dota 2: PuckChamp vs Team Lynx (BO3) - Asgard Champi… on Kalshi vs Polymarket
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →