Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Kalshi vs Polymarket) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | View on Polymarket → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | View on Polymarket → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | View on Polymarket → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | View on Polymarket → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | View on Polymarket → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Map 2 Winner | 100% |
| O/U 2.5 Games | 100% |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: METANOIA WOLVES (-3.5) vs MAGICOS (+3.5) | 100% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 100% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: MAGICOS (-3.5) vs METANOIA WOLVES (+3.5) | 100% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: MAGICOS (-6.5) vs METANOIA WOLVES (+6.5) | 100% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 18.5 | 100% |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: METANOIA WOLVES (-6.5) vs MAGICOS (+6.5) | 100% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.5 | 100% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 30.5 | 100% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 36.5 | 100% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 39.5 | 100% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 45.5 | 1% |
| Map 1 Winner | 0% |
| Match Winner | 0% |
| Map Handicap: MW (-1.5) vs MAGICOS (+1.5) | 0% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: METANOIA WOLVES (-3.5) vs MAGICOS (+3.5) | 0% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 0% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 0% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: METANOIA WOLVES (-3.5) vs MAGICOS (+3.5) | 0% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.5 | 0% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: METANOIA WOLVES (-6.5) vs MAGICOS (+6.5) | 0% |
| Map Handicap: MAG (-1.5) vs METANOIA WOLVES (+1.5) | 0% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: MAGICOS (-9.5) vs METANOIA WOLVES (+9.5) | 0% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.5 | 0% |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: MAGICOS (-3.5) vs METANOIA WOLVES (+3.5) | 0% |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: METANOIA WOLVES (-9.5) vs MAGICOS (+9.5) | 0% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: METANOIA WOLVES (-6.5) vs MAGICOS (+6.5) | 0% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: METANOIA WOLVES (-9.5) vs MAGICOS (+9.5) | 0% |
Market context
The underlying event is a Counter-Strike 2 match between METANOIA WOLVES and MAGICOS, scheduled for 3:00 PM ET on 3 July 2026 as part of the CCT South America Series 3 Group Stage. Prediction markets currently assign a 0% implied probability to METANOIA WOLVES winning round 4, while Robinhood’s broader contract shows METANOIA WOLVES at 38¢ versus MAGICOS at 62¢, indicating a clear but not absolute preference for MAGICOS across platforms[1].
Historically, zero-implied-probability outcomes in esports prediction markets often signal either a match cancellation or a severe mispricing before live odds adjust; comparable cases from the CCT South America qualifiers show that when a team is listed at 0% pre-match but later plays, the market typically corrects within hours once in-play data confirms viability[5]. This divergence between the 0% round-4 contract and the 38¢ overall win line suggests traders should treat the former as a structural anomaly rather than a genuine forecast of defeat.
Key catalysts include the official start time confirmation, any delay notices from the tournament organiser, and the transition to live odds once the match begins, as pre-match lines switch to in-play pricing that recalculates continuously[3]. Traders should monitor Dust2.us for real-time fixture updates and Liquipedia for team roster changes, as both platforms have recently confirmed METANOIA WOLVES’ participation in the South American qualifier[4][5]. If the match is delayed beyond seven days without a winner, the contract resolves to 50-50, making timing dependencies critical for settlement.
Methodology
This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote, four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to Kalshi vs Polymarket, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.
Resolution & payout
Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.
Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.
FAQ
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- Do I need to KYC for this market?
- On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like Kalshi vs Polymarket trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade Counter-Strike: METANOIA WOLVES vs MAGICOS (BO3) - C… on Kalshi vs Polymarket
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →