Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Kalshi vs Polymarket) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | View on Polymarket → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | View on Polymarket → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | View on Polymarket → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | View on Polymarket → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | View on Polymarket → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Map Handicap: 100T (-1.5) vs Infinite (+1.5) | 100% |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-3.5) vs Infinite (+3.5) | 100% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-3.5) vs Infinite (+3.5) | 100% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-6.5) vs Infinite (+6.5) | 100% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-3.5) vs Infinite (+3.5) | 50% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 50% |
| Map 1 Winner | 0% |
| Map 2 Winner | 0% |
| Match Winner | 0% |
| O/U 2.5 Games | 0% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 0% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 0% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.5 | 0% |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-6.5) vs Infinite (+6.5) | 0% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.5 | 0% |
Market context
Infinite meet 100 Thieves in a best-of-three Round of 32 play-in at the Esports World Cup Open Qualifier, with the market currently pricing **0% YES** on Infinite and making 100 Thieves the clear side in the cross-platform picture. Polymarket’s contract page describes 100 Thieves as the stronger roster and shows trader consensus leaning that way, while Bitget’s event page has 100 Thieves around **78%** and Strafe user voting is even more one-sided at **95%** for 100 Thieves, so the main divergence is not between venues so much as between a near-zero market and broadly bullish external sentiment on 100 Thieves.[1][9][14][8]
The historical frame is straightforward: this is a small-field qualifier match where ranking and recent form matter more than brand name. 100 Thieves are listed around **37th** by Dust2.us against Infinite at **49th**, and other trackers put 100 Thieves higher as well, which supports the favourite status across most comparison sites.[2][12] Recent form data also points in the same direction, with 100 Thieves carrying a two-match winning streak on Dust2.us, while Infinite’s recent results are more mixed, including losses to Betclic and HOTU.[2] In similar BO3 qualifier spots, the market usually tracks whichever team has the clearer roster strength and cleaner recent results, rather than overreacting to tournament label alone.[1][2]
The main catalysts are procedural rather than macro: final confirmation that the series starts on schedule, any bracket or server-side delay, and whether either side is affected by a walkover, forfeit or roster issue, because those outcomes change settlement under the market rules.[1] The schedule pages already place the match in the Aug. 9 slate, but timing has appeared in slightly different local windows across trackers, so traders should watch for official match-room updates rather than relying on third-party clocks alone.[3][7][11] Given the present spread between 0% on the contract and the 78–95% band on other platforms, any verified pre-match change in line-up status or start time is more likely to move the probability than routine form chatter.[9][14][8]
Methodology
Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). That keeps the comparison honest — a single canonical probability across the row, with the venue-by-venue trade-offs spelt out in the columns next to it.
Resolution & payout
Polymarket-based markets settle through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and unchallenged proposals finalise the resolution. Payouts settle automatically in USDC the moment the result is final — no bookmaker, no delay.
Kalshi-based markets settle in USD via the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse. Betfair Exchange settles in GBP/EUR net of commission. Manifold is play-money and does not pay out real funds.
FAQ
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- Do I need to KYC for this market?
- On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like Kalshi vs Polymarket trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade Counter-Strike: Infinite vs 100 Thieves (BO3) - Espo… on Kalshi vs Polymarket
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →